I read these interesting thoughts on whether we should go to church or withdraw and worship privately.
Apparently, this was a discussion during the seventeen hundreds
as it is for some today.
"Human nature makes us seek the approval or sympathy of others in every significant act or event.
Religion is personal—
like marriage,
the birth of a child,
or the death of someone we love—
yet we still mark these publicly.
We neither laugh nor weep alone;
why then should we pray alone?
Religious feelings are among the most contagious we have.
If devotion really exists in the heart of each individual,
it is morally impossible it should exist there apart and single.
If genuine devotion exists in individual hearts,
it almost inevitably spreads and merges into a shared flame.
Public and private worship each have clear strengths,
so both are valuable.
Public worship is livelier and more energetic;
private worship feels more intimate and tailored to our personal circumstances.
Most criticisms of one apply equally to the other:
superstition, wandering thoughts, dullness, and selfish requests
can appear in either setting.
Public worship has distinct advantages.
It teaches people how to pray
who would otherwise struggle,
and it trains us to pray as members of a community
rather than for purely private gain.
Public worship has another advantage over private worship:
it helps guard against both spiritual coldness
and unhealthy enthusiasm.
Without the encouragement of shared worship,
many people struggle to maintain devotion
in silence and solitude.
Yet if a person's sense of spiritual realities is especially strong,
prolonged isolation can also lead the imagination
into mystical extremes
and the overheated mysticism
that can arise from unchecked solitary brooding. (I found that interesting.)
Public worship helps preserve a healthy balance,
avoiding both indifference and excess.
For worldly minds, solitary devotion is too weak;
for weak minds, it is unhelpful;
for passionate minds, it is unsafe." Anna Lititia Barbauld.



